Mac ps emulator with save state and frame skip

Mac ps emulator with save state and frame skip generator#
Mac ps emulator with save state and frame skip mod#

Another construct often used is a deck, as in a deck of cards. There's LOTS of ways to pick random numbers, each one with different costs and implications to the feel. One key takeaway of what outlines above is that the way you pick random numbers can have a profound outcome on the 'nature' or 'feel' of the resulting gameplay.ДЇor instance if I say I will ring a bell once per day, and I pick the random time of the day, when that time comes up I ring the bell, you can know that I will ring that bell once a day for sure.Д«ut if I slice up the day into 24 hours and every hour I roll a 24-sided dice and if it comes up 1 I ring the bell, you might get no bells for a very long time, or a bunch of bells all scattered around the middle of the afternoon for example. now you have to wait another max(1000) frames for another chance. what if another script is ALSO calling Random and it steals your 100 from you. How that distributes across your range and float conversion/error may cause ripples in your distribution).

Mac ps emulator with save state and frame skip mod#

really the underlying range is guaranteed usually being something like 0->RNG mod range. This means that if you call a Range(1,1000) 1000 times you should (in theory) get every possible result in that range once (in theory of course.

Mac ps emulator with save state and frame skip generator#

But a pseudo-random number generator distributes evenly. Note that Random uses a global random state. Is that really fair?ДЄlso, our distribution odds are getting shared. If I play on a better computer I actually could get way more mines being dropped. 1:1000 chance of dropping every frame.ДЄlso it means your drop frequency is tied to framerate. Like what does the '100' mean? Nothing reallly. My beef with this approach is there's no real easy way to suggest WHEN that will happen. Now I would argue the determination of when that would drop is. And squareroots are way more expensive than any mult/sub/add/mod/bitshift And people do those every frame all the time. things like calculating the distance between 2 objects in 3d-space is probably more expensive (3 subtractions, 3 squares, 2 additions, 1 squareroot). So I doubt 5 or so of them is all that bad. When your CPU says it does 2ghz, it means that it can do 2 billion of any of those operations per second. All things your processor can do VERY FAST. but it's usually just some multiplication/modulo/addition/bit shifting.

The algorithm of the random number dictates what that arithmetic is. The processor only calculates the next random number when you ask it too.ДЄnd that calculation isn't really all that difficult to calculate.